Between Modernization Theory and World Systems Theory

Eva Selin
3 min readAug 3, 2023

Unraveling Development Approaches

Development has been a fundamental goal for societies worldwide, seeking to enhance their economic, social, and political well-being. Over the years, several theories have emerged to guide nations on their path to development. Two prominent perspectives in this realm are Modernization Theory and World Systems Theory. In this article, we will delve into the proposed actions by both theories and evaluate which approach holds more promise for achieving sustainable and inclusive development.

Modernization Theory: A Progressive Leap Forward

Modernization Theory emerged in the mid-20th century and posits that development is a linear process where societies evolve from traditional to modern stages. This theory is rooted in Western ideas and suggests that societies must undergo a series of changes, such as industrialization, urbanization, and the adoption of liberal democratic institutions, to achieve development.

According to Modernization Theory, developed countries should play a significant role in assisting less developed nations through foreign aid, technological transfers, and knowledge sharing. The goal is to accelerate the process of modernization, which proponents argue will ultimately lead to increased economic growth, improved living standards, and the emergence of democratic governance.

World Systems Theory: The Perils of Global Capitalism

World Systems Theory, on the other hand, challenges the linear approach of Modernization Theory and offers a more critical perspective. Developed by sociologist Immanuel Wallerstein, this theory focuses on the global capitalist system and its effects on nations’ development trajectories.

According to World Systems Theory, the world is divided into three main zones: the core, the semi-periphery, and the periphery. The core countries are economically dominant and exploit the peripheral nations for cheap labor and resources, perpetuating their underdevelopment. World Systems Theory argues that the capitalist system perpetuates inequality and prevents genuine development in the peripheral countries.

Contrary to Modernization Theory, World Systems Theory emphasizes the importance of addressing global structural inequalities and empowering peripheral countries to participate in a more equitable global economic order. Advocates of this approach propose collective action and cooperation among developing nations to challenge the dominance of core countries and build self-reliance.

Which Approach is Better for Development?

The debate between Modernization Theory and World Systems Theory remains complex, with both approaches having their strengths and weaknesses. Modernization Theory’s focus on economic growth and technological advancement has, indeed, led to success stories in some countries. However, it has also been criticized for its Western-centric bias and for overlooking cultural, historical, and institutional factors that play crucial roles in development.

On the other hand, World Systems Theory highlights the structural barriers imposed by the global capitalist system. By addressing the root causes of underdevelopment, it offers a more inclusive perspective. Nonetheless, implementing such a transformative vision faces substantial challenges, and critics argue that it may not be feasible in a deeply interconnected global economy.

A Call to the Reader

As we conclude our exploration of these development theories, it is essential to recognize that there is no one-size-fits-all solution for development. Each nation faces unique circumstances, and the context in which these theories are applied matters greatly. Both Modernization Theory and World Systems Theory present valuable insights and critiques that can inform development strategies.

As a reader, the question now lies with you: What do you believe is the most effective approach for achieving sustainable and inclusive development? Should we prioritize rapid modernization and technological advancement, or should we strive to challenge the global capitalist system and pursue a more equitable economic order? The path towards development is an ever-evolving journey, and your perspective matters in shaping a better future for all.

--

--

Eva Selin
Eva Selin

Written by Eva Selin

https://linktr.ee/evaselin Weekly Casual Writing on Behavioral Sociology I Media I Globalization Resarcher @unimi

No responses yet